About Me
I’m Jeff, an CS/AI undergraduate at Carnegie Mellon. My area of
interest in AI is primarily NLP, the lingual aspects of Computer
Science. This is because I always found myself trying to make sense
of systems in motion. These were systems that would adapt and change
over time; language seemed to be that sort of system. In my free
time, I catch up with friends, go on trail runs, watch Netflix, but
always make time to read. My favourite writers include Dickens,
Orwell, and the late Christopher Hitchens (not in that order): whose
articles and essays I found are just as entertaining as their novels
or best-sellers. These interests are probably why I’m working on the
CRED Initiative, a tech-based response to media misinformation.
Project Description
Increased media misinformation is negatively impacting public
understanding: on topics such as Climate Change, Covid-19, Political
Activism, public reputation etc. This initiative will provide the
public with an easy-to-use tool (browser-extension) to identify
misinformed media articles, comparing it to other articles and
placing the article’s claims on a spectrum of consistency, using
modern NLP techniques. The scope of this project will focus on
articles related to Climate Change, to achieve proof-of-concept
before applying to varied other topics.
CRED represents our initiative’s four main objectives: Context,
Reputation, Evaluation and Dissent.
Context: Our browser extension aims to provide context to various
media articles. With the click of a button, a user would be able to
see a quantifiable figure, representing the similarity of claims to
other articles. With the click of another button, the user could see
detailed information regarding their article’s claims. It would
include a line diagram, representing the spectrum of articles with
various claims, for visual clarity; this would allow users to
navigate the diverse landscape of opinions, in an accessible
way.
Reputation: One use of this growing measure of article context is
keeping track of media outlets’ leanings toward and from the
mainstream opinion. This will provide users with a general guideline
toward media outlets’ inclinations on mainstream or deviant
opinions.
Evidence: Evidence is the panacea for misinformation. In the process
of accessing detailed information, users will be provided with full
links to articles from which their context scores were derived. This
is done both as an additional resource for users as well as a matter
of transparency.
Dissent: The program will include a ‘Devil’s Advocate’ feature. That
is, using the information on the correlation between articles, our
program would recommend articles of a different point of view, or at
least, the ‘most’ radically different view of the topic at hand. The
system will be carefully designed to trail the fine line between
contrarianism and fake news. However, done properly, it would
provide a valuable tool for users to explore pieces outside their
normal consumption.